Zeitgeists in Zeitgeists
The German poet Goethe once said that “he who cannot draw on three thousand years is living from hand to mouth.” Three thousand years is already a gold mine to draw knowledge from. What more if it is possible to draw from the memory of our whole species? The collective unconscious is a term coined by Carl Jung to describe a “reservoir of the experiences of our species.” Sadly, I think that to be able to acquire these memories consciously is still impossible. We’re not even sure if the collective unconscious actually exists. But its existence and our innate ability to acquire memories from our collective unconscious involuntarily are things that I believe to be true.
In a classroom discussion, my FIL12 prof once cited an anthropologist’s possible rationale to the Filipino’s habit of urinating on walls. He said that land was communal to Filipinos prior to colonization. Because of this, walls were rarely used to enclose portions of land. When the Spaniards conquered the Philippines, the Filipinos were introduced to land titles. Walls were built around lots, which angered the early Filipinos. This anthropologist believed that the Filipino’s habit of urinating on walls is a subconscious manifestation of the precolonial Filipino’s indignation for walls. The present day Filipino inherits this subconscious distaste from the memories of precolonial Filipinos in the collective unconscious.
In Richard Linklater’s Waking Life, one of the minor characters in the story explored the topic of reincarnation. She believed that reincarnation was just a poetic expression for collective memory. People who believe that they are reincarnations of Alexander the Great or Cleopatra are not really reincarnations. She thought that these people acquired these memories of Alexander the Great or Cleopatra from the our collective memory.
One field of study where parallelism is very apparent is in literature. One example would be the myth of the great flood. Two sources of the myth immediately come to mind - the Hebrew story of Noah and the Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh. Apart from this, other versions of the myth appear in various cultures around the world. To name a few, India has the story of Matsyu, the Greeks have the myth of Deucalion, and the Aztecs also have their own version. All of these stories include a warning from a higher being to a chosen few, and their eventual survival to repopulate the land.
To further expound on uncanny coincidences in literature, I will recount a story which happened four years after Philip K. Dick wrote Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said. Dick met a nineteen-year-old girl, Kathy, who had a boyfriend named Jack. Later on, he then learned that Kathy was a drug dealer. Soon, he also learned that she is having a relationship with a police inspector. What is puzzling is that these real people were identical to the characters in his novel - Kathy, who is a drug dealer, has a boyfriend named jack, and is having a relationship with a police inspector. He told his priest about this incident. As he was telling this story to the priest, the priest interrupted him, saying that he was narrating the Book of Acts. True enough, the events and characters in the novel were parallel to those in the Book of Acts.
I do not think that certain parallelisms are only mere coincidence. There has to be a meaningful pattern in all of these - reincarnation, unintentional similarities in literature, and even urinating on walls. There must exist an intricate lattice of coincidences which connect to each other brought about the collective unconscious. To quote a character in Repo Man: “Suppose you’re thinkin’ about a plate o’ shrimp. Suddenly someone’ll say, like, plate, or shrimp, or plate o’ shrimp out of the blue, no explanation. No point in lookin’ for one, either. It’s all part of a cosmic unconsciousness.”
Gerry Forde said,
February 27, 2008 at 3:42 pm
Yeh, you’ll think “I must ring X” and the next thing the phone goes and X is calling you. The Catholic teaching has a thing called the communion of saints, that somehow everyone both living and dead are connected, and by making “sacrifices” for the dead you can speed their way through the waiting room of purgatory to heaven. In the same way, I’m sure you can send messages of love and caring for people by just thinking about them and they will receive them. There is a way we can connect outside of the limits of time and space. I have seen it myself when someone got extremely agitated one night for no apparant reason. It turned out that at exactly that time a friend had burned to death in her flat. Only intuitive people can have these experiences though. If your full focus is on the concrete here and now you’ll never accept anything of this. Best Wishes!
Superman said,
February 28, 2008 at 11:38 pm
Whoa…nosebleed. Well, Rodney starts out with a quote by a German poet about experiences and memory. From there, he proposes the collective unconscious based on Jung’s term. He then states his belief, that the collective unconscious does exist. After that he starts stating anecdotes, mostly rooted in history. After the anecdotes, he ends with saying that there is a pattern that can be seen, and this manifests the collective unconscious. However, it is all just speculation, and then quotes a character from Repo man.
- The entry was pretty interesting, it’s something that I’ve never heard about, and the way it was written shows a lot of effort and thought.
- The entry was very organized, specially the way in which Rodney supports the collective unconscious that build up through the years with related historical literature, give a sense of unity.
- Pretty fun to read. It gives even more insight on the “unknown” abilities of our brains.
Jean Grey said,
February 29, 2008 at 2:43 am
THe entry is about that thing the author believes is true.. He introduces the topic by a certain quote, and the background of why he came to believe his belief.
He actually believes that collective unconscious exists and he also believes in humans’ability to acquire memories from collective unconscious involuntarily.
To elaborate his topic, he gives the anecdotes, three of them, and then restates his claim that collective unconscious is present as seen in the pattterns.
The entry was a littlle difficult to understand, and honestly, it wasn’t very interesting. It was like reading a psychology book or something. The topic was a little heavy. But anyway, the author really showed effort and thought because, the topic was really heavy, quite unexpected, especially for a freshie. If i read this without the knowledge as to who the author is, I’d probably think it was written by one of the scientists asked to answer what do you believe…
The essay was well-organized, and the flow was very satisfactory. It was very substantial
It was informative. Well-written.
rodney said,
February 29, 2008 at 2:46 am
I appreciate the criticism, Jean Grey. I guess adapting a conversational tone isn’t as easy as it looks.